Skip to content

Chichester Local History Society

A generation which ignores history has no past and no future

  • Home
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
  • About
  • Programme
  • Publications
    • Journal
    • New Chichester Papers
  • Shopping
    • Buy Journal
    • Buy New Chichester Papers
  • Links
    • Chichester Pubs
  • Contact
    • Membership
    • Committee Members
    • Contact Form
  • Blog
  • X
  • Toggle search form

Chichester faces an epidemic as recorded in WG5/1a/1 Minutes of the Court of the Poor Law by Philip Robinson

Posted on April 3, 2020March 12, 2024 By Bob No Comments on Chichester faces an epidemic as recorded in WG5/1a/1 Minutes of the Court of the Poor Law by Philip Robinson

In 1759 there was some concern in Chichester about a potential epidemic. The new Board of Guardians for the poor had been established. It had first met on Monday 2nd July 1753 to agree its structure and allocate responsibilities. This followed an Act of Parliament that had incorporated the nine parishes of the city into a single Corporation to administer the relief to the poor. At that initial meeting of the Court of Assembly, 33 gentlemen attended, and Sir John Miller was unanimously elected its President for the coming year. Sir John’s father, grandfather and great grandfather had served as Members of Parliament for the City, and his grandfather and great grandfather had served the City as Mayor.

Within a year any initial enthusiasm seems to have declined; no doubt Sir John had more important matters to attend to and was frequently absent from meetings of the Court. Despite that, and though he appeared not to be present (his name is not included with the attendees) he was again unanimously elected in 1754 to serve another year as President, though the minutes record he rarely attended. In the following year Henry Peckham was elected President with twelve votes in his favour and eight against.

By early 1759 attendance at meetings has dropped to about a dozen, indeed in the 5th February only five members turned up and “business could not be transacted”. At the annual appointment of Officers of the Corporation in April Richard Buckner, a former Mayor of the city, was unanimously elected as President and at his first meeting, Friday 27th April, with 16 members present, notice was given that the 71 children in the workhouse should be inoculated against smallpox and that those surgeons and apothecaries willing to help the Guardians should deliver their proposals to a meeting of the Court on Monday.

At that meeting 25 members arrived and the question was put as to whether the children in the workhouse should be inoculated or not. A ballot was held with a red ball indicating support and a white ball opposition to the proposal. Eight voted in favour and seventeen against inoculation.

The minutes do not record the debate, nor the reasons why members took the decision they did. We can speculate whether the rejection was based on a fear of inoculation, or simply the cost to the Guardians of providing for 71 children. The following charts illustrate what happened next, and of course, then, as now, no one knew how events would unfold.

The first chart shows the annual mortality against the average for the 18th Century, the annual average number of deaths in Chichester was 89 but in 1759 reached 373. The chart also shows that it was a local epidemic, the deaths in England (figures taken from Wrigley and Schofield “The Population History of England” pp 499/500) remain close to the annual average of one hundred and seventy thousand.

The second chart depicts the tsunamic wave that was to hit the city in the summer of 1759. Edward Jenner, who did so much to advance our understanding of smallpox and the efficacy of vaccination, was only 10 years old. The minutes of the Guardians for the rest of 1759 remain silent on the impact of the epidemic on the City. Today we have far greater understanding, but even today people want to ignore the signs and treat the epidemic as false news. No one is immune from the tsunami but acting responsibly we will recover and return to a different, and possibly, more compassionate world.

Disease, Law, Local history, Statistics, Statute Tags:Chichester, Court of Assembly, Epidemic, Local History, Mortality

Post navigation

Previous Post: St Wilfrid ~ some observations by Professor Philip Robinson (Chairman of CLHS)
Next Post: Newsletter October 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • The Battle of Birdham Bridge – prizefighting in Chichester
  • Four new ‘Pubs’ added to digital map
  • The Chichester Festival Theatre Props Store
  • Richard Chitty of Chitty & Vernon – builders of HMS Hind (1749)
  • Pat Combes Remembered

Recent Comments

  1. Mark Elliott on The Birth of the East Broyle Estate
  2. Bob on Chichester Pubs
  3. Bob on Chichester Pubs
  4. Mary knight on Old Atherington and the washed away villages of West Sussex
  5. Bob on The Birth of the East Broyle Estate

Copyright © 2026 Chichester Local History Society.

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme

Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}